Contraception during Disaster and Pandemic Periods: Challenges and Strategies (2024)

What is Open Access?

Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.

Our Authors and Editors

We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.

Content Alerts

Brief introduction to this section that descibes Open Access especially from an IntechOpen perspective

How it Works Manage preferences

Contact

Want to get in touch? Contact our London head office or media team here

Careers

Our team is growing all the time, so we’re always on the lookout for smart people who want to help us reshape the world of scientific publishing.

Home > Books > Women's Health Around the Globe [Working Title]

Contraception during Disaster and Pandemic Periods: Challenges and Strategies (2)Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Written By

Ayşe Topcu Akduman and Ayşe Figen Türkçapar

Submitted: 24 September 2024 Reviewed: 13 October 2024 Published: 27 November 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1007932

From the Edited Volume

Women's Health Around the Globe [Working Title]

Dr. Edward Araujo Júnior and Prof. Julio Elito Jr.

Chapter metrics overview

2 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Disasters and pandemics have profound impacts on healthcare systems, significantly affecting the efficiency and accessibility of Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) services, thereby increasing the risks to women’s reproductive health. Contraceptive methods and tools are among the most crucial factors that help individuals manage their reproductive health. Although there is growing recognition that SRH care is an integral component of disaster response, this issue often fails to receive the necessary attention during crises. This chapter aims to address gaps in knowledge regarding the improvement of contraceptive services during disaster and pandemic periods, review current practices, and fill knowledge gaps in this field.

Keywords

  • contraception
  • sexual and reproductive health
  • disaster
  • pandemic
  • epidemic

Author Information

Show +

  • Ayşe Topcu Akduman*

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Health Science University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Ayşe Figen Türkçapar

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Health Science University, Ankara, Turkey

*Address all correspondence to: drayse58@gmail.com

1. Introduction

Family planning is a process designed to enable individuals to have the desired number of children at their preferred time [1]. Contraception, on the other hand, encompasses various methods used to reduce or entirely eliminate the risk of pregnancy. These methods can be classified as hormonal methods (birth control pills, injections), barrier methods (condoms), natural methods (calendar-based methods), and surgical methods (tubal ligation) [2]. Contraception plays a key role in helping individuals effectively manage their sexual and reproductive health, with the primary goal of preventing unintended pregnancies. Access to contraceptive services becomes especially critical during disasters and pandemics, as it helps safeguard health and prevent unwanted pregnancies. In such situations, the sustainability of family planning practices is essential for community rebuilding and improving individuals’ quality of life.

The desire to have children represents a complex and multidimensional facet of human existence. Throughout history, childbirth has been viewed as one of the most crucial events in life, and despite the associated risks, fertility has continued unabated under various circumstances [3]. In ancient civilizations, including those of the Egyptians, Romans, and Greeks, numerous methods—such as herbal mixtures, vaginal sponges, and other techniques—were utilized to manage fertility and prevent pregnancies [4]. The increased understanding of human anatomy and the reproductive system during the Renaissance period laid the foundation for the advancement of contraceptive practices. The groundbreaking approval of the first oral contraceptive by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1960 represented a significant transformation in the field of family planning [5]. In the last 60years, progress in this area has been remarkably swift and effective, resulting in the creation of safer and more diverse hormonal contraceptives (HCs) [2]. Nevertheless, with nearly half of all pregnancies globally still being unintended, there is a clear necessity for further innovations and improvements in family planning services.

The accessibility and sustainability of family planning services are of paramount importance for safeguarding individuals’ reproductive rights and enhancing overall societal well-being [6]. In many countries, these services are shaped by legal frameworks that align with societal needs and national policies. However, during times of crisis, such as pandemics and natural disasters, family planning services often experience significant disruptions, which can have serious adverse effects on public health. The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in 2019, along with the global response to it, has clearly illustrated the worldwide disruptions faced by various cultural, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups in accessing reproductive health services and how these services have been affected [7].

The World Health Organization defines disasters as events that exceed local capacity and significantly disrupt the functioning of a community, necessitating national or international assistance [8]. Disasters can be categorized into two main types: natural (such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, droughts, and pandemics) and human-made (including chemical spills and wars). In recent years, events like the 2020 Australian bushfires, the floods in Turkey and Europe in 2021, and the major earthquakes in Turkey and Morocco in 2023 have left profound impacts on humanity. Notably, the earthquake centered in Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, in 2023 resulted in substantial loss of life and severely affected healthcare services and infrastructure in the region [9]. Similarly, pandemics can trigger global health crises. Over the past decade, pandemics such as COVID-19 (2019-present), Ebola (2014–2016, 2018-present), Zika virus (2015–2016), and HIV have had significant global repercussions. Moreover, studies indicate that it typically takes around 23months to fully reveal the impacts of pandemics on perinatal health, underscoring the seriousness of these situations [10]. Large-scale disasters lead to interruptions in the overall structure of healthcare services, resulting in critical challenges that severely affect sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. The repercussions are particularly profound and extensive for vulnerable groups, such as women and children [11]. It is essential for individuals, healthcare teams, hospitals, and health systems to be adequately prepared to effectively manage such crises and to develop robust strategies in this regard.

This section will address the fundamental issues that may arise in reproductive health services, particularly in contraception, during times of disaster and pandemic. The challenges faced during significant recent disasters and pandemics will be examined through examples from the literature. Additionally, the section will evaluate approaches that could be integrated into strategic plans to prevent similar adverse outcomes in the future. It will also focus on the necessary measures, policy recommendations, and ways to optimize healthcare services to ensure the effective provision of contraceptive services during crisis periods.

Advertisement

2. The importance of contraceptive services during epidemics and disasters

During crisis periods such as pandemics and disasters, safeguarding sexual and reproductive health is crucial for both individual and public health. Sexual and reproductive health services should encompass not only prenatal care, skilled delivery, and postpartum care but also comprehensive abortion services and family planning (FP) services. It is essential that these services continue uninterrupted throughout all phases, including emergencies [12]. Disruptions in family planning services can lead to an increase in unintended pregnancies, subsequently raising maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.

The uncertainty, mental health issues, and adverse living conditions brought about by crisis periods can increase women’s tendencies to avoid pregnancy. However, the heightened burden on health systems often leads to the limitation of contraceptive resources and makes access to services more challenging, resulting in a further rise in unintended pregnancies [13]. For instance, an assessment of the impact of the Ebola outbreak on health systems and community health in Sierra Leone revealed an increase in adolescent pregnancies following the epidemic [14]. Unintended pregnancies are associated with negative outcomes such as unsafe abortions, miscarriages, pregnancy complications, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, suicide, and partner violence.

Evidence indicates that disasters can have both short- and long-term effects on pregnancy outcomes. For instance, a study conducted in Sumatra revealed that improvements in maternal and infant mortality rates stagnated following a major earthquake, during which there was an increase in child mortality and stillbirth rates [15]. Additionally, following the gas leak incident in Bhopal, India, a high incidence of spontaneous abortions was reported, aside from congenital anomalies [16]. It was noted that the destruction of crops after Hurricane Gilbert led to a decrease in folic acid intake, which was associated with an increase in neural tube defects [17]. These findings demonstrate that disasters can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes in various ways. Women may unintentionally become pregnant, or a planned pregnancy can turn into an unwanted situation. It is well-established that desired and planned pregnancies result in more favorable outcomes for both maternal and child health.

In addition to the negative impacts on services provided during epidemic periods, uncertainties regarding transmission routes of the virus, its fetal and maternal effects during pregnancy, and the efficacy and safety of treatments and vaccines significantly influenced the behaviors of women planning pregnancies or who are already pregnant. Similarly, the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak clearly illustrates the effects of disasters on pregnancy [18]. The Zika virus epidemic, which began in 2015, created a major public health crisis in Brazil, exposing women of reproductive age to a range of potentially serious risks concerning their pregnancies and their children’s health. During this period, uncertainties surrounding the virus’s transmission, its fetal and maternal impacts, and the lack of available vaccines and treatments significantly affected the behaviors of women considering pregnancy or those already expecting. Research indicates that while women may wish to delay their pregnancy plans, there exists a notable disconnect between their fertility desires and their behaviors. One of the most prominent reasons for this disconnect is the challenges women face in accessing sexual and reproductive health services [19, 20].

Disasters often have a disproportionately greater impact on women compared to men. The tsunami disaster that occurred in December 2004 exemplifies this situation dramatically, as it revealed that the highest mortality rates were among women and girls. This finding underscores the exacerbation of gender inequality during crisis periods, placing women at greater risk. The obstacles women face in accessing healthcare highlight the critical importance of protecting sexual and reproductive health. The 2004 tsunami serves as a stark reminder of the gender-based violence and increasing incidents of sexual harassment experienced by displaced women in affected countries [21]. During this process, deficiencies in women’s sanitation needs, secure living spaces, and access to contraception became evident, leading to an increase in unintended pregnancies and a heightened need for protection.

The importance of safeguarding sexual and reproductive health becomes particularly evident during crises, especially concerning the additional risks faced by pregnant individuals. During infectious disease outbreaks, pregnant populations are often more susceptible to infections compared to other demographic groups. The physiological changes associated with pregnancy can render these individuals more vulnerable to infections, potentially increasing the risk of severe illness [22]. Furthermore, there are risks related to vertical transmission and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pathological processes, particularly placental abnormalities, can lead to intrauterine growth restrictions, stillbirths, preterm births, and congenital anomalies, significantly adversely affecting both maternal and fetal health.

For instance, infants born to women infected with the H1N1 virus are more likely to experience preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), and lower Apgar scores [23]. The Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in 2014 was associated with maternal mortality rates ranging from 39 to 42%. Additionally, nearly 80% of EVD cases resulted in spontaneous miscarriages and stillbirths [24]. During the Zika virus outbreak from 2015 to 2016, which affected over 50 countries, the prevalence of congenital microcephaly was reported to be approximately 3% [25]. There has been limited research on the perinatal health impacts of MERS-CoV, first identified in 2012 and primarily affecting Middle Eastern countries, which later spread to Asia, Africa, Europe, and other regions of the United States. The main observed perinatal outcomes include stillbirth, preterm birth, and maternal mortality [26]. Systematic reviews of neonatal outcomes for infants born to mothers with COVID-19 during pregnancy indicate an increase in rates of preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA) outcomes [27].

Pandemics and disasters place significant pressure on health systems, directly affecting access to essential family planning services. During such crises, women face various barriers related to healthcare worker shortages, supply chain disruptions, and access to health services. The experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate that these challenges are likely to recur in future pandemic or disaster situations. According to UNFPA’s report on The Impact of COVID-19 on Family Planning and Ending Gender-based Violence, disruptions of this nature are anticipated. This underscores the need for proactive strategies to ensure the continuity of family planning services during crisis periods [28].

Table 1 summarizes the primary effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on family planning and suggests that similar effects can be expected in other epidemic or disaster scenarios:

Key effects of COVID-19 on family planningChallenges
Healthcare worker shortagesThe focus of clinical staff on the pandemic prevents them from allocating time to family planning services.
Closure of health facilitiesMany facilities are closing or restricting family planning services.
Access restrictionsWomen avoid visiting health facilities due to fear of exposure to COVID-19 or movement restrictions.
Supply chain disruptionsSupply chain interruptions limit contraceptive availability in many places, leading to stock depletion.
Inability to use preferred methodsProduct shortages and lack of access to trained healthcare providers may lead women to use less effective methods or abandon contraceptive use entirely.
Increase in unintended pregnanciesIf disruptions continue for six months, an additional 7 million unintended pregnancies are expected.

Table 1.

The impact of COVID-19 on family planning: Key effects and associated challenges.

Furthermore, instances of gender-based violence have increased during the pandemic, with UNFPA estimating that if service interruptions persist for six months, there could be an additional 31 million cases. Similarly, programs combating female genital mutilation and child marriage have been severely disrupted, with millions of new cases anticipated by 2030 [28].

These effects are not limited to the COVID-19 pandemic; similar disruptions and challenges are expected in future pandemics or disasters. It is crucial for health systems to plan necessary strategies in advance to sustain family planning services during such crises.

Advertisement

3. Challenges in providing contraceptive services during crises

This section will address the fundamental challenges faced in providing contraceptive services under crisis conditions and discuss the negative impacts of these challenges on women’s and community health.

3.1 Logistical barriers: Supply chain disruptions, medication and material shortages

Disaster and epidemic situations significantly restrict access to healthcare services. Supply chain disruptions, along with shortages of materials and personnel, pose logistical challenges that hinder the provision of sexual and reproductive health services. Interruptions in access to essential healthcare, particularly concerning contraceptive and pregnancy-related emergency services, increase the risk of unwanted pregnancies and health complications.

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted access to healthcare services, including contraceptive services. A study conducted in South Africa and Zambia involved a survey of 537 women and in-depth interviews with 39 participants. The findings indicated that while there was no significant change in contraceptive use among the participants, barriers to access were reported, including long wait times, shortages of supplies, and fears related to COVID-19 [29].

The World Health Organization defines inequities in access to reproductive health services as unjust differences both within and between groups [30]. Access to contraceptive services is particularly crucial for disadvantaged groups, such as migrants. Research in Europe has shown that immigrant and refugee women experience higher rates of unwanted pregnancies and abortions compared to their non-immigrant counterparts [31, 32].

Displacements following disasters and epidemics are fraught with various logistical barriers that significantly affect immigrants’ access to sexual and reproductive health services. Disruptions in the supply chain, along with shortages of medications and materials, complicate the delivery of these essential services. In migrant camps, healthcare is often constrained by inadequate infrastructure and limited resources. Delays in procuring necessary contraceptive supplies during emergencies increase the risk of unwanted pregnancies and associated health complications. A study conducted in Oslo, Norway, revealed that the contraceptive needs of Somali immigrant women are not adequately met, with knowledge gaps regarding the safety and accessibility of modern contraceptive methods identified as significant barriers [33]. This situation is considered one of the contributing factors to the high rates of unwanted pregnancies and abortions among immigrant women in Europe.

Zika virus infection is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, and congenital brain abnormalities. As of 2016, Puerto Rico reported the highest number of Zika virus cases among the United States and its territories, highlighting the need for effective and accessible contraceptive methods for women living in these areas who do not wish to become pregnant. Reports indicate that approximately two-thirds of women of reproductive age in Puerto Rico experience unintended pregnancies, with significant restrictions in access to contraceptive methods [34].

In environments with limited financial resources, providing healthcare services during disaster periods becomes significantly more challenging. The inherent burden that disasters place on healthcare systems is compounded by financial pressures, adversely affecting the capacity to deliver essential services. Among the groups most impacted by these challenges are women and children [14]. For instance, a study examining the effects of the 2010 Haiti earthquake on women’s reproductive health found that increased earthquake intensity led to a decrease in the use of injections, the most common modern contraceptive method in Haiti, resulting in a rise in unwanted pregnancies. Furthermore, the study noted that the severity of the earthquake intensified the unmet need for family planning among women and reduced their access to condoms [35].

3.2 Shortage of healthcare workers and services: Interruptions in healthcare personnel and clinical services

During disasters and pandemics, there is often a widespread lack of information and education regarding sexual health and contraceptive methods. Disruptions in educational and informational activities can hinder individuals from acquiring sufficient knowledge about contraceptive options. This limitation can subsequently restrict both the demand for contraceptive services and their effective utilization.

For instance, during the Ebola outbreak, nurses and midwives in Sierra Leone continued to provide care driven by various motivations, including their professional responsibilities, community obligations, and religious beliefs. This situation serves as a significant example of the continuity of healthcare services [36]. Similarly, a study examining access to contraceptives and changes in contraceptive methods before and after the 2006 earthquake in Indonesia found a decrease in the use of injections and implants within a year following the disaster, alongside an increase in the use of oral contraceptives. Additionally, the prevalence of coitus interruptus as a contraceptive method significantly rose post-disaster, and participants facing difficulties accessing contraceptive methods exhibited higher rates of unintended pregnancies. The extensive damage to healthcare facilities in Yogyakarta is believed to have restricted the abilities of nurses and midwives to perform intrauterine device insertions, implant placements, or administer injections, contributing to the observed outcomes [11].

These examples illustrate how the challenges faced by healthcare workers during disasters and pandemics affect access to sexual health and contraceptive services. A notable critical factor that emerges is the lack of education, which poses a significant threat to the continuity of these services.

3.3 Cultural and social barriers: Increased societal pressures, security concerns, and misinformation during crises

Socio-cultural barriers encompass various factors that hinder women’s use of modern contraceptive methods, including religious beliefs, societal norms, social pressures, and opposition from partners to the use of such methods [33].

Studies conducted in Europe indicate that unwanted pregnancy and abortion rates are notably higher among immigrant and refugee women, many of whom do not utilize modern contraceptive methods. For instance, a study involving Somali immigrant women in Oslo identified systemic and socio-cultural barriers, such as language difficulties, inadequate information, religious beliefs, gender roles, and social pressures, that complicate access to contraceptive methods for these women. The research highlighted that although a significant portion of Somali women expressed a willingness to maintain their desired birth spacing, these barriers impede their ability to use modern contraceptive methods [33].

Religion is a significant component of the socio-cultural fabric in many societies, with religious leaders playing a crucial role in either facilitating or hindering the adoption of contraceptive methods. For instance, in Nigeria, the prevalence of modern contraceptive use remains alarmingly low at 9.8%. A study assessing the impact of exposure to family planning messages from religious leaders found that women exposed to these messages were 70% more likely to utilize modern contraceptive methods (odds ratio=1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.54–1.87; P<0.001) [37].

The widespread sexual violence directed at women and girls displaced due to disasters, coupled with inadequate gender-sensitive health services and unsafe living conditions, has been documented as creating camp environments that expose women to an increased risk of harassment by undermining cultural norms [21].

3.4 Psychological and social factors

Disasters and pandemics can profoundly impact individuals’ psychosocial well-being. Psychological factors such as stress, trauma, and anxiety can indirectly lead to adverse outcomes in sexual and reproductive health. In particular, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other psychiatric conditions can significantly influence sexual health behaviors and the use of contraceptives during these periods. The pressures created by psychosocial issues negatively shape attitudes toward and access to contraceptive services.

During periods of disaster and pandemics, women’s fertility preferences are influenced by psychosocial factors such as heightened anxiety and uncertainty. A study conducted in Turkey examined how COVID-19 affected women’s pregnancy plans; it found that some women postponed their plans due to the anxiety generated by the pandemic, while others decided to pursue pregnancy due to increased free time and a desire for closeness with their partners. This indicates that pandemics can influence not only fertility preferences but also decisions regarding contraception [18].

During disaster periods, although there is a general decline in quality of life, cultural norms supporting extended family structures persist. This situation emerges as a deterrent factor in the use of contraception. Women, in particular, experience peer pressure from other women and mothers, leading to encouragement for those with fewer children to have more. These social norms and peer pressure are significant contributors to the low utilization of contraceptive methods [33].

Male partners’ resistance to family planning also presents a significant barrier to contraceptive use. For instance, studies conducted with refugees have revealed that women often fear their husbands may seek another partner if they do not bear a sufficient number of children [33]. Similarly, a study conducted in Tanzania found that women who used contraception without their husbands’ consent faced the risk of violence or divorce [38].

During the COVID-19 pandemic, migrant women faced structural barriers to accessing healthcare, compounded by fears of discrimination. Concerns about health and safety became significant factors influencing their contraception and pregnancy choices. A study conducted in New York revealed how economic hardships and health anxieties during the pandemic shaped migrant women’s reproductive health decisions [39].

3.5 Political and economic factors: Changes in government policies and lack of funding

Disasters and pandemics can significantly exacerbate economic challenges, which in turn restrict individuals’ access to contraceptive products. Loss of income and economic crises can limit personal health expenditures, reducing the allocation of resources to essential healthcare services such as contraception. Low-income individuals and communities are particularly vulnerable to these adverse effects.

The high cost of modern contraceptive methods has been reported as a major barrier to their use. For instance, a study by Gele et al. on Somali immigrant women in Oslo identified the high cost of modern contraception as a key obstacle to contraceptive use [33].

Advertisement

4. Strategies for ensuring continuity of contraceptive services during crises

4.1 Telemedicine: The use of remote health services

Pandemics and disasters often lead to interruptions in access to healthcare services. In this context, telemedicine has emerged as an effective strategy to ensure the continuity of contraceptive services. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, posed significant challenges to young people’s timely access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, highlighting the need for telemedicine solutions. A study by Sturgiss et al. (2022) found that international innovations aimed at improving SRH access for young people, and services provided through telemedicine, have been instrumental in raising awareness about gender-based violence [40].

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine for contraceptive services rapidly increased. In a study conducted with open-ended responses from 546 contraceptive providers in the United States, it was noted that telemedicine facilitated continuous access and overcame challenges posed by in-person visits. Providers emphasized the importance of telemedicine in reaching young people, especially when schools were closed. However, challenges such as lack of awareness about available services and limited access to technology were also reported. Additionally, concerns were raised about reduced personal connection and privacy issues during virtual consultations [41].

In conclusion, while telemedicine is a vital tool, it is essential to address the challenges encountered during crises and develop hybrid care models to ensure effective service delivery.

4.2 International collaboration and support: The role of international organizations and non-governmental organizations

Access to SRH services becomes crucial for saving women’s lives during periods of crisis and disaster. In this context, international and non-governmental organizations play a vital role in ensuring the continuity of SRH services, particularly in the face of emergencies such as pandemics and natural disasters. These entities provide essential guidelines and standards for maintaining SRH services in times of crisis, supporting women’s access to critical healthcare, including safe childbirth and family planning services, and facilitating the uninterrupted delivery of these essential services.

The 1978, Alma-Ata Declaration emphasized that access to healthcare is a fundamental human right, which can be achieved through primary healthcare (PHC) systems [42]. Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services represent a core component of both primary and secondary healthcare, and their continuity in disaster-affected regions is of paramount importance, especially through international collaboration and support. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other global actors actively promote the preservation of these critical services and develop policies and programs to ensure sustained access at the PHC level.

To underscore the significance of these efforts, it is important to note that the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) projected in 2015 that two-thirds of maternal deaths worldwide occur in countries affected by humanitarian crises or vulnerable conditions [43]. The Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health, implemented by the United Nations between 2010 and 2015, has saved millions of lives and made progress toward achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, by the end of this period, women, children, and adolescents in disaster and crisis-affected areas continued to face significant challenges in accessing essential healthcare services. To address this issue, the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s, and Adolescents’ Health for the period 2016–2030 was developed, aiming to ensure access to health services for women and children, even in the context of humanitarian crises and challenging environments [44].

In this regard, it is crucial for national governments to strengthen the resilience of their health systems to reduce maternal mortality and ensure access to universal health services. The European Sexual and Reproductive Health Action Plan emphasizes the importance of improving access to contraception services for disadvantaged groups, such as migrants [45].

In addition to efforts conducted by international organizations, numerous local initiatives are also ongoing. For instance, a research project supported by the Government of Bangladesh’s National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT) includes operational research aimed at improving sexual and reproductive health services in remote and disaster-prone areas. This project seeks to identify feasible interventions for Menstrual Regulation (MR) and Post-Abortion Care (PAC) that can be implemented in hard-to-reach healthcare facilities in the Barisal and Sylhet regions [46].

Advertisement

5. Case studies of best practices

5.1 Successful strategies

Strategies that have been effectively implemented during pandemics and disaster periods play a critical role in ensuring the continuity of sexual and reproductive health services. One notable example is the Z-CAN (Zika Contraception Access Network) program, which was launched in Puerto Rico during the Zika virus outbreak. This initiative provided a comprehensive approach to preventing unintended pregnancies by offering a variety of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), at no cost. The program was a collaborative effort involving federal and local health agencies, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations. Between 2016 and 2017, Z-CAN served over 21,000 women, enabling them to access their chosen contraceptive methods on the same day. This resulted in a significant increase in the utilization of LARC methods. The Z-CAN model is regarded as an effective solution for enhancing access to contraceptive services in future outbreaks and disasters [47].

5.2 Regional and global experiences

Another successful initiative involves postpartum family planning (FP) strategies. Emergency postpartum family planning (EPPFP) interventions can contribute to the prevention of over 30% of maternal deaths and hold significant importance during humanitarian crises. In 2014, Save the Children incorporated postpartum intrauterine devices (IUDs) into their emergency family planning package, followed by the inclusion of implants in 2017. Countries with high-intensity EPPFP implementations have reported a notable increase in the adoption of IUDs or implants among women within the first 48hours post-delivery. These findings indicate a strong demand for long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) in humanitarian settings [48].

During epidemics and disaster periods, the significance of self-administered contraceptive methods for women increases. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) “Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers,” specifically in the “Providing Family Planning Services During an Epidemic” section, highlights that various contraceptive methods can be safely and effectively used without direct support from healthcare providers. Table 2 provides essential information regarding these self-administered methods [49].

Contraceptive methodsUsage methodNotes
Combined oral contraceptives (COCs)Taken orally on a daily basisSafe and effective; suitable for self-administration.
Progestin-only pills (POPs)Taken orally on a daily basisSafe and effective; suitable for self-administration.
Emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs)Taken orally as soon as possible after unprotected intercourseProvides rapid solutions in emergency situations.
SpermicidesInserted into the vagina prior to intercourseEasily applied by users; provides a barrier to sperm.
DiaphragmsInserted into the vagina prior to intercourseMust be used with spermicide; effective barrier method.
Condoms (male and female)Worn during intercourseSafe and effective; widely used; provides dual protection against STIs.

Table 2.

Self-care for contraception: Primary contraceptive methods used by women during epidemics.

Enhancing the accessibility of these methods will help protect women’s health and facilitate their access to necessary services. It is crucial to remember that the self-administration of contraceptives is a vital strategy for ensuring women’s access to health services.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion and recommendations

Ensuring the continuity of contraceptive services during disasters and pandemics necessitates significant advance planning and preparedness. This process involves identifying material and personnel requirements and developing strategic preparations for emergency scenarios. Additionally, training programs aimed at increasing the knowledge and awareness of healthcare workers and communities regarding contraception can promote the effective and appropriate use of services.

Collaboration between international and local health organizations can enhance the accessibility of contraceptive services by optimizing resource management. Community-supported approaches can also contribute to the dissemination of these services. Emergency contraception is a critical component in safeguarding sexual and reproductive health, and the strategies and solutions developed during this process can improve access to and effectiveness of health services, thereby mitigating the adverse health impacts of emergencies.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization. Family Planning. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning
  2. 2. Genazzani AR, Fidecicchi T, Arduini D, Giannini A, Simoncini T. Hormonal and natural contraceptives: A review on efficacy and risks of different methods for an informed choice. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2023;39(1):2247093. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2023.2247093
  3. 3. Price NL, Hawkins K. A conceptual framework for the social analysis of reproductive health. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition. 2007;25(1):24-36
  4. 4. Christin-Maitre S. History of oral contraceptive drugs and their use worldwide. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013;27(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2012.11.004
  5. 5. Tyrer L. Introduction of the pill and its impact. Contraception. 1999;59(1 Suppl):11S-16S. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00131-0
  6. 6. World Health Organization. Family planning/Contraception. 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs351/en/
  7. 7. Riley T, Sully E, Ahmed Z, Biddlecom A. Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health In low- and middle-income countries. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2020;16(46):73-76. DOI: 10.1363/46e9020
  8. 8. World Health Organization. Emergency and Essential Surgical Care: Disasters and Emergencies. Available from: http://www.who.int/surgery/challenges/esc_disasters_emergencies/en/ [Accessed: October 30, 2017]
  9. 9. Balikuddembe JK, Reinhardt JD, Vahid G, Di B. A scoping review of post-earthquake healthcare for vulnerable groups of the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):945. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18395-z
  10. 10. Malange VNE, Hedermann G, Lausten-Thomsen U, Hoffmann S, Voldstedlund M, Aabakke AJM, et al. The perinatal health challenges of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases: A narrative review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;5(10):1039779. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039779
  11. 11. Hapsari ED, Widyawati, Nisman WA, Lusmilasari L, Siswishanto R, Matsuo H. Change in contraceptive methods following the Yogyakarta earthquake and its association with the prevalence of unplanned pregnancy. Contraception. 2009;79(4):316-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.10.015
  12. 12. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: An Essential Element of Universal Health Coverage. New York: UNFPA; 2020
  13. 13. Aly J, Choi L, Christy AY. The impact of coronavirus on reproduction: Contraceptive access, pregnancy rates, pregnancy delay, and the role of vaccination. F&S Reviews. 2022;3(3):190-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.05.002
  14. 14. Azmat SK, Ali M, Siddiqui FJ, Tirmizi SFA, Kiarie J. Scoping review on the impact of outbreaks on sexual and reproductive health services: Proposed frameworks for pre-, intra-, and Postoutbreak situations. BioMed Research International. 2021;8(2021):9989478. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9989478
  15. 15. Djafri D, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A. Effect of the September 2009 Sumatra earthquake on reproductive health services and MDG 5 in the city of Padang, Indonesia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP1444-NP1456
  16. 16. Kapoor R. Fetal loss and contraceptive acceptance among the Bhopal gas victims. Social Biology. 1991;38:242-248
  17. 17. Duff EM, Cooper ES. Neural tube defects in Jamaica following hurricane Gilbert. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84:473-476
  18. 18. Akduman AT, Türkçapar AF, İçöz T, Özdemir Ö, Karaşahin KE. Fertility preferences of Turkish married women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2023;26(11):885-893. DOI: 10.26719/emhj.23.110
  19. 19. Chen HL, Tang RB. Why Zika virus infection has become a public health concern? Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2016;79(4):174-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.03.001
  20. 20. Marteleto LJ, Weitzman A, Coutinho RZ, Alves SV. Women's reproductive intentions and Behaviors during the Zika epidemic in Brazil. Population and Development Review. 2017;43(2):199-227. DOI: 10.1111/padr.12074
  21. 21. Pittaway E, Bartolomei L, Rees S. Neglected issues and voices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2007;19(69):69. DOI: 10.1177/101053950701901S11
  22. 22. Sappenfield E, Jamieson DJ, Kourtis AP. Pregnancy and susceptibility to infectious diseases. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;2013:752852. DOI: 10.1155/2013/752852
  23. 23. Newsome K, Alverson CJ, Williams J, McIntyre AF, Fine AD, Wasserman C, et al. Outcomes of infants born to women with influenza a(H1N1)pdm09. Birth Defects Research. 2019;111(2):88-95. DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1445
  24. 24. Bebell LM, Oduyebo T, Riley LE. Ebola virus disease and pregnancy: A review of the current knowledge of Ebola virus pathogenesis, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Birth Defects Research. 2017;109(5):353-362. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23558
  25. 25. Martins MM, Alves da Cunha AJL, Robaina JR, Raymundo CE, Barbosa AP, Medronho RA. Fetal, neonatal, and infant outcomes associated with maternal Zika virus infection during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):1-26. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246643
  26. 26. Alserehi H, Wali G, Alshukairi A, Alraddadi B. Impact of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2016;2(16):105. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1437-y
  27. 27. Chi H, Chiu NC, Tai YL, Chang HY, Lin CH, Sung YH, et al. Clinical features of neonates born to mothers with coronavirus disease-2019: A systematic review of 105 neonates. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection. 2021;54(1):69-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.07.024
  28. 28. UNFPA. The Impact of COVID-19 on Family Planning, Gender-Based Violence, Female Genital Mutilation, and Child Marriage. Glastonbury, CT: Avenir Health; Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University; 2020
  29. 29. Callahan RL, Cartwright AF, Beksinska M, Kasaro M, Tang JH, Milford C, et al. Contraceptive access and use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study in South Africa and Zambia. Gates Open Research. 2024;18(7):61. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres. 14590.1
  30. 30. Leeners B, Bieli S, Huang D, Tschudin S. Why prevention of repeat abortion is so challenging: Psychosocial characteristics of women at risk. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2017;22(1):38-44. DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1258053
  31. 31. Raben LAD, van den Muijsenbergh METC. Inequity in contraceptive care between refugees and other migrant women?: A retrospective study in Dutch general practice. Family Practice. 2018;35(4):468-474. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmx133
  32. 32. Bruckner TA, Mortensen LH, Catalano RA. Social and demographic drivers of trend and seasonality in elective abortions in Denmark. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):214. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1397-2
  33. 33. Gele AA, Musse FK, Shrestha M, Qureshi S. Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229916. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229916
  34. 34. Tepper NK, Goldberg HI, Bernal MI, Rivera B, Frey MT, Malave C, et al. Estimating contraceptive needs and increasing access to contraception in response to the Zika virus disease outbreak--Puerto Rico. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2016;65(12):311-314. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6512e1
  35. 35. Behrman JA, Weitzman A. Effects of the 2010 Haiti earthquake on Women's reproductive health. Studies in Family Planning. 2016;47(1):3-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2016.00045.x
  36. 36. Jones S, Sam B, Bull F, Pieh SB, Lambert J, Mgawadere F, et al. 'Even when you are afraid, you stay': Provision of maternity care during the Ebola virus epidemic: A qualitative study. Midwifery. 2017;52:19-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.009
  37. 37. Adedini SA, Babalola S, Ibeawuchi C, Omotoso O, Akiode A, Odeku M. Role of religious leaders in promoting contraceptive use in Nigeria: Evidence from the Nigerian urban reproductive health initiative. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2018;6(3):500-514. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00135
  38. 38. Schuler SR, Rottach E, Mukiri P. Gender norms and family planning decision-making in Tanzania: A qualitative study. The Journal of Public Health in Africa. 2011;2(2):e25. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2011.e25
  39. 39. Samari G, Wurtz HM, Desai S, Coleman-Minahan K. Perspectives from the pandemic epicenter: Sexual and reproductive health of immigrant women in New York City. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2024;56(2):136-146. DOI: 10.1111/psrh.12260
  40. 40. Sturgiss E, Dut GM, Matenge S, Desborough J, Hall Dykgraaf S, Mazza D, et al. COVID-19 and access to sexual and reproductive healthcare for young people: An overview of the international literature and policy. Australian Journal of General Practice. 2022;51(4):271-277. DOI: 10.31128/AJGP-10-21-6206
  41. 41. Rao L, Comfort AB, Dojiri SS, Goodman S, Yarger J, Shah N, et al. Telehealth for contraceptive services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Provider perspectives. Womens Health Issues. 2022;32(5):477-483. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.05.001
  42. 42. ICPHC. (International Conference on Primary Health Care). Declaration of Alma-Ata. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1978. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/almaata-declaration-en.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2023]
  43. 43. UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund). Maternal Mortality in Humanitarian Crises and in Fragile Settings. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2015. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/maternal-mortality-humanitarian-crises-and-fragile-settings [Accessed: November 12, 2015]
  44. 44. Every Woman Every Child. The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030): Survive, Thrive, Transform. 2015. Available from: https://www.gavi.org/global-health-development/unsg-global-strategy [Accessed: May 25, 2024]
  45. 45. World Health Organization. Action Plan for Sexual and Reproductive Health: Towards Achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Europe–Leaving No One behind. Geneva: WHO; 2016
  46. 46. Ray-Bennett NS, Ekezie W, Biswas I, Choudhary NI, Cowie D, Dissanayake L, et al. Sexual and reproductive service interventions for menstrual regulation, safe abortion, and post-abortion care and their effectiveness during disaster response: A global systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2024;15:359-373. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-024-00565-7
  47. 47. Lathrop E, Romero L, Hurst S, Bracero N, Zapata LB, Frey MT, et al. The Zika contraception access network: A feasibility programme to increase access to contraception in Puerto Rico during the 2016-17 Zika virus outbreak. The Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(2):e91-e99. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30001-X
  48. 48. Gallagher MC, Morris CN, Fatima A, Daniel RW, Shire AH, Sangwa BMM. Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A comparison across six humanitarian country contexts. Frontiers in Global Women's Health. 2021;6(2):613338. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.613338
  49. 49. World Health Organization. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Knowledge for Health Project, United States Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Population and Reproductive Health

Written By

Ayşe Topcu Akduman and Ayşe Figen Türkçapar

Submitted: 24 September 2024 Reviewed: 13 October 2024 Published: 27 November 2024

© The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Contraception during Disaster and Pandemic Periods: Challenges and Strategies (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Edmund Hettinger DC

Last Updated:

Views: 6060

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (58 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edmund Hettinger DC

Birthday: 1994-08-17

Address: 2033 Gerhold Pine, Port Jocelyn, VA 12101-5654

Phone: +8524399971620

Job: Central Manufacturing Supervisor

Hobby: Jogging, Metalworking, Tai chi, Shopping, Puzzles, Rock climbing, Crocheting

Introduction: My name is Edmund Hettinger DC, I am a adventurous, colorful, gifted, determined, precious, open, colorful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.